The Starbucks Lawsuit: Do You Think They Should Get Sued?
Hey folks, here’s some brewing news about Starbucks that’s making headlines. A federal judge has given the green light for a lawsuit to proceed against Starbucks. Why, you ask? Well, it’s because some of their Refresher fruit drinks might be missing a key ingredient – fruit!
U.S. District Judge John Cronan recently ruled that Starbucks can’t simply brush off this lawsuit. According to TODAY.com The judge rejected Starbucks’ request to dismiss most of the claims in a class-action complaint. Why? Because he believes that a reasonable number of customers would assume that these drinks should actually contain the fruits they proudly display in their names.
Starbucks, however, is standing firm, calling these allegations “inaccurate” and “without merit.” The saga began in August 2022 when a complaint was filed in the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York. It alleged that Starbucks used deceptive marketing practices for several of its Refresher drinks.
Now, let’s get into the juicy details. The drinks in question are the Mango Dragonfruit Lemonade Starbucks Refreshers, Mango Dragonfruit Starbucks Refreshers, Strawberry Açaí Lemonade Starbucks Refreshers, Strawberry Açaí Starbucks Refreshers, Pineapple Passionfruit Lemonade Starbucks Refreshers, and Pineapple Passionfruit Starbucks Refreshers. According to the plaintiffs, these drinks are missing the very fruits they’re named after, like mango, passion fruit, and açaí berry.
The plaintiffs, Joan Kominis and Jason McAllister, claim that “reasonable consumers” bought these drinks thinking they contained all the fruits clearly listed in their names. But according to the judge, these drinks mainly consist of water, grape juice concentrate, and sugar. That’s quite a departure from what you’d expect based on the names alone.
Starbucks’ defense? Well, they argue that the fruit names are meant to describe the flavors, not the actual ingredients. But Judge Cronan didn’t buy that argument, saying that unlike the term ‘vanilla,’ ‘mango,’ ‘passionfruit,’ and ‘açaí’ are generally understood to represent both flavor and ingredients.
So, what’s next? Two allegations were dismissed by the judge, but nine others are moving forward to trial. The plaintiffs, represented by lawyer Robert Abiri, are seeking damages exceeding $5 million.
It’ll be interesting to see how this case unfolds, and we’ll be sure to keep you updated on any developments. So, if you’re a Starbucks fan or just curious about this fruity legal battle, stay tuned for more updates.