Taylor Swift is Dubbed ‘The Millennial Bruce Springsteen,’ Twitter React
Taylor Swift is undoubtedly one of the biggest stars in music, and with her level of exposure, comparisons are bound to come. And this new comparison to Bruce Springsteen will likely cause a lot of discussion.
In a new feature on Vox titled “Taylor Swift is the millennial Bruce Springsteen,” writer Emily VanDerWerff examines in detail the careers of both Swift and Springsteen. While she wrote on Twitter that the piece was “my worst take…I ABSOLUTELY believe in this bad take. With my whole heart,” VanDerWerff makes some very valid arguments to support her seemingly bold statement.
For starters, VanDerWerff points out, “Springsteen and Swift each entered the music industry as young wunderkinds with lots to prove.” She also points at how both artists shifted their musical directions at critical points in their careers and achieved their massive mainstream breakthroughs. VanDerWerff writes, “For instance, ‘Born to Run’ and Swift’s 2014 album ‘1989’ were released when their respective artists were 25. Both broke the artists through to even wider acclaim than they had before.”
VanDerWerff also compares the stories and topics upon which Swift and Springsteen center their songs.
“Both musicians love songs about a kind of white Americana that’s never really existed but that the central characters of which feel compelled to chase anyway,” writes VanDerWerff. “They use those songs to tell stories about those people and the places they live. They’re terrifically good at wordplay. Both are fascinated by the ways that adolescence and memories of adolescence continue to have incredible power for adults. Both are amazing at crafting bridges that take already good songs to another level. And both write songs featuring fictional people whose lives are sketched in via tiny, intimate details that stand in for their whole selves.”
Perhaps the strongest, most intriguing point VanDerWerff makes and what will likely lead to a greater discussion is this: “What’s most interesting about drawing this connection are the ways in which the overlap between Springsteen and Swift’s styles can tell us about how our culture treats art made by men versus art made by women — and art made by baby boomers versus art made by millennials.”
With that in mind, reactions to this piece on Twitter have been intense. Here’s is just a selection of some of the notable ones.
With respect to @emilyvdw, who is both smart and good, I disagree! Taylor Swift is the Billy Joel of now, not the Springsteen https://t.co/U2wy4duQI7
— Margaret Eby (@margareteby) July 31, 2020
Maybe the subject of Working Class Struggles resonates with people more than being an Affluent Young Woman and that's why Springsteen is taken more seriously? These all could be true but I don't think Bruce's music would be as popular if it was about being a wealthy white dude.
— dhaakon (@dhaakon) July 31, 2020
Hasn't really seemed to hurt her in terms of popularity. 😂
— Lets (@Letficks) July 31, 2020
I've always been a big Bruce Springsteen fan, and I've grown up with Taylor swift's music. Honestly I think it has the most to do with the audience. We don't respect art aimed at teenage girls.
Taking the rest of the day to process this https://t.co/DidCAVjbW3
— Vinnie Mancuso (@VinnieMancuso1) July 31, 2020
Taylor Swift can’t be the next Bruce Springsteen because she lacks the hold over New Jersey that Bruce has.
— John Wickham BlackLivesMatter (@jtwickham88) July 31, 2020
As someone who has their Masters in Springsteen and PHD in Taylor Swift, I can confirm this ⬇️ https://t.co/RFNxHxi4Dw
— Jess (@Bloom2294) July 31, 2020
What if we just... didn't do this?https://t.co/8BbO5gBOgh
— Joe Kendrick (@JoeAKendrick) July 31, 2020
Well, this is sending into a Bruce deep dive. Really interesting comparison.https://t.co/i7GCxXGjPW
— JB!!!🪩🐻🍉 (@JBfromDC89) July 31, 2020